Thursday, November 29, 2007

Tuff

I have to say, I enjoy Paul Beatty's "Tuff" more than any other book we've read this semester. I have a preference for the postmodern genre, and satire is kind of my thing. The only tv shows I watch are satire, and it's refreshing to find a book like that. "Tuff" seems to be the most modern book we've read this semester, although the others were written around the same time period. I think Beatty does this by giving us a stereotypical American environment that we have all been familiar with for some time. The "ghetto" of New York City has become a symbol for America's poor African American community, as well as the origin of drugs, crime, and cultural disintigration in America. I feel that the ghetto of NYC has been so over exposed, that a somewhat unreal definition of it has become the stereotype. Beatty uses the sterotype of this environment and the sterotype of the people who live in this environment, to satirize modern society. He does this expertly. Beatty's use of these stereotypical characters enables his readers to have a sense of familiarity with the story, while he is really attacking the readers for using the stereotypes. We discussed in class that satire is a good way, espcially in African American racial issues, to bring up big problems with society in a way that makes the readers feel more comfortable. It is ironic how Tuffy's father doesn't believe that Tuff can win the position for city council, when he is supposedly an ex Black Panther, who has always encouraged black empowerment. This book is filled with irony, and sometimes the irony is upsetting. What I mean by upsetting is, that at first it is funny or interesting, but when it actually sinks into your mind, it makes the reader upset at how correct that irony is. This is what Beatty is trying to do to his readers. Satire is a more comfortable way of reaching people on big issues, but I also think it hits its readers harder, because they see how correct the satire is when they look at thier own misguided first reactions to it.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Fledgling 3

This is a very long overdue post, but my final judgement of "Fledgling" is that it got much better towards the end, and I started to see much more symbolism. The idea of memory was one of the most important ideas I saw. Shori's memory loss is much like the present African American community's loss of memory for the pasts of their ancestors, as was also suggested in "All Aunt Hagar's Children." She doesn't remember anything about her past or her family. She does not feel she belongs anywhere, yet she is instructed to, "...seem more Ina than they" (272). She is also seen as a threat to many of the Ina families because of her genetic differences, as African Americans were seen as a threat to white Americans, and sometimes still are. A passage that was very thought-provoking to me was when Joan told Shori at the trial, "You begin to overshadow your dead" and, "Remember your dead...Keep them around you. And remember what you want" (245). The whole idea of Shori overshadowing her dead was interesting to me. Was this supposed to suggest that African Americans today are overshadowing the turmoils of their ancestors? I don't know, however, I think that Butler was trying to make the same statement as Jones that African Americans today are forgetting where they came from and must remember their histories if they want a chance at equality or justice.
Another tie I saw between the story and the real world was the Ina's initial denial of racism within the Ina people. Wells insisted that race meant nothing to them when looking for symbionts, and that they were happy about Shori's genetic superiority. This seemed equal to many Americans' views that racism is no longer an issue in America. As in America, the Ina soon found out that there was still much bitter racism going on, and it was the main cause for all of the recent Ina deaths. My favorite passage in this book, because it reminded me of the African American sense of dislocation and search for equality, was when Shori said, "My memory of them is gone. I can't even mourn them properly because for me, they never really lived. Now I have begun to relearn who I am, to rebuild my life, and my enemies are still killing my people. Where is there safety for my symbionts or for me?" (271). This is what I think the current African American community is going through: relearning, rebuilding, and the ever-present sense of dislocation.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Fledgling 2

I've noticed a sort of slave owner- slave relationship between the Ina and their symbiants. We've talked about how they both seem to need each other. The Ina need the symbiants for food and energy, and the symbiants will die if they aren't exposed to enough of their Ina's venom. This can be compared to the way slave owners needed slaves to do the work that they couldn't handle all by themselves, and the slaves didn't necessarily need the slave owners, but would have had nowhere else to go in a land full of animosity towards them. I think it is safe to say the Ina are the ones being compared to the slaves in this book, however. When Brook is describing some of the Ina's history, she says, "...physically, he and most Ina fit in badly wherever they go- tall, ultrapale, lean, wiry people. They usually looked like foreigners, and when times got bad they were treated like foreigners- suspected, disliked, driven out, or killed" (136). So either way you look at it, there is support for the suggestions of the Ina or the symbiants being compared to slaves, or an opressed race in general.
I thought it was very interesting when Brook and Shori were talking about where the Ina species came from and some stories about what they are doing on earth. I saw a comparison to Toni Morisson's "Paradise" when Brook says, "Some future generation of them is supposed to leave this world en masse and go to paradise- or back to the homeworld" (137). This really reminded me of the last lines of "Paradise," and just the whole idea that these people are all looking for some idea of home or paradise.
Also, I am starting to warm up to this book, though I still think it is far less superior to those we have read previously. :)